×

Quiz Session - Attempts With Random Questions

PMI-PBA Exam Questions

Page 2 of 25

21.

A change request has been implemented, but testing reveals that it has introduced new defects. How do you address this situation?

  • Conduct a root cause analysis

  • Blame the development team for not implementing the change correctly

  • Revert the change immediately and inform the stakeholders that it cannot be implemented

  • Escalate the issue to the project manager and request additional resources for testing

Correct answer: Conduct a root cause analysis

A root cause analysis helps identify the underlying reasons for the defects and provides insights into how to prevent similar issues in the future.

The other answer options in this instance are reactive and don't address the underlying problem.

22.

You are writing user stories for a new software system. Which of the following best describes the purpose of a user story?
 

  • Describe a feature from the perspective of the user

  • Detail the technical specifications of a feature

  • Document the acceptance criteria for a feature

  • Outline the steps involved in implementing a feature

Correct answer: Describe a feature from the perspective of the user

User stories are short, simple descriptions of a feature from the user's point of view. They focus on the user's goals and the value they expect to gain from the feature.

Technical specifications are separate from user stories and are usually addressed during the design phase.

Acceptance criteria are part of a user story but don't encompass its entire purpose.

Implementation steps are technical details that are not included in the user story itself.

23.

A recently completed business solution project failed to achieve its intended outcomes despite meeting all the technical requirements. Upon reflection, it was discovered that the acceptance criteria were not aligned with the actual business needs. What was the most likely cause of this misalignment?

  • Insufficient stakeholder involvement

  • Failure to validate the acceptance criteria with end users

  • Lack of clear communication of the acceptance criteria to the project team

  • Overemphasis on technical requirements at the expense of business needs

Correct answer: Insufficient stakeholder involvement

While all options could contribute to misalignment, insufficient stakeholder involvement in defining the acceptance criteria is the most likely root cause. Acceptance criteria should be defined collaboratively with stakeholders to ensure they reflect their actual needs.

Validating after defining acceptance criteria may not solve core issues. It can highlight problems but not address root causes.

Clear communication is crucial, but if the acceptance criteria themselves are misaligned, even the clearest communication won't lead to the desired business outcomes. The team might perfectly execute on misaligned criteria.

Overemphasis on technical requirements is a contributing factor to failed projects, but it's not the only cause. Sometimes, technical requirements might be met, but they don't reflect the business's true needs.

24.

You have been asked to review the business case for a new business solution project. Which of the following is not a component of a business case?

  • Detailed project schedule and resource plan

  • Problem statement and analysis

  • Expected benefits and financial justification 

  • Identification of risks and assumptions

Correct answer: Detailed project schedule and resource plan

A business case presents the strategic reasoning behind a project or solution, assessing its goals, potential benefits, and risks. It avoids detailed execution or project plans, enabling stakeholders to evaluate the project's alignment with strategic objectives and make informed decisions about feasibility and viability.

The problem statement and analysis are core elements of a business case.

Examining the expected benefits and financial justification for a project is crucial for decision-makers and a key component of the business case.

Identifying risks and assumptions is important for understanding project feasibility and is weighed heavily in the business case. 

25.

You are working on a complex web design project with multiple interconnected requirements. Which traceability technique would be most effective for visualizing the relationships between requirements and design elements?

  • Affinity diagram

  • Traceability matrix

  • Requirements traceability repository

  • Impact analysis

Correct answer: Affinity diagram

Affinity diagrams are specifically designed to visually map out complex relationships between elements. They are particularly effective in organizing and structuring qualitative data, such as ideas, observations, or issues. They can also be used to identify root causes, understand user needs and requirements in product development, organize and cluster ideas to generate innovative solutions, and analyze customer preferences and market trends to develop marketing strategies for business solutions.

Traceability matrices are useful for tracking but not as visual for complex links.

Repositories store traceability data but don't provide the same visual representation.

Impact analysis assesses change effects, not the initial relationships.

26.

Which of the following is not a key input to obtaining stakeholder sign-off?  

  • Project budget

  • Validated test results

  • Risk mitigation plan

  • Requirements traceability matrix

Correct answer: Project budget

Budgeting consideration is vital for project management; it doesn't solely drive stakeholders' decision to approve the proposed solution.

Test results confirm that the solution satisfies the specified requirements through a rigorous validation process and is crucial for stakeholder approval.

The risk mitigation plan effectively tackles potential problems, thereby boosting stakeholders' confidence.

Approval from stakeholders is heavily influenced by whether the solution satisfies their needs, which is confirmed by the requirements traceability matrix.

27.

What is a key characteristic of a successful sign-off meeting?

  • All stakeholders feel their opinions have been heard and considered

  • The project manager makes all the final decisions on the requirements

  • The meeting is kept as short as possible to avoid wasting time

  • Technical details of the requirements are discussed in depth

Correct answer: All stakeholders feel their opinions have been heard and considered

A successful sign-off meeting is collaborative and inclusive. All stakeholders should have the opportunity to express their opinions and concerns and feel that their feedback is valued. This fosters buy-in and commitment to the project.

The project manager facilitates the meeting but should not make unilateral decisions.

Rushing the meeting can lead to overlooked concerns and lack of understanding.

While technical details may be discussed briefly, the focus should be on stakeholder understanding and agreement.

28.

During a brainstorming session with stakeholders, you identify a potential new feature for a product. This feature hasn't been thoroughly explored yet, and its details are unclear. How would you classify this requirement in the product backlog?

  • Emergent

  • Detailed appropriately

  • Estimated

  • Prioritized

Correct answer: Emergent

Emergent requirements are those that are discovered or evolve during the project. They haven't been fully defined or understood yet, which fits the description of this new feature.

Detailed appropriately is the wrong choice here, as it implies the requirement is fully understood and ready for development, which is not the case here.

The feature might eventually be estimated, but at this early stage, it's too undefined to have a reliable estimate.

Prioritization typically happens once requirements are better understood.

29.

What does net present value (NPV) measure?

  • Profitability of an investment over time

  • Total revenue generated by a project

  • Liquidity of a company’s assets

  • Asset allocation over time 

Correct answer: Profitability of an investment over time

Analysts can measure the profitability of an investment or business solution over time by calculating the present value of future cash benefits and taking inflation and other fiscal factors into consideration. The higher the Net Present Value (NPV), the greater value the proposed business solution is predicted to offer.

Total revenue generated by a project, liquidity of a company’s assets, and asset allocation over time are all incorrect, as they don’t equate to profitability of an investment over time.

30.

What is the main objective of defining the future state?

  • Identify improvement solutions

  • Document current processes

  • Analyze historical data

  • Assess stakeholder satisfaction

Correct answer: Identify improvement solutions

The main objective of defining the future state is to present a comprehensive framework of outcomes companies and businesses want to achieve as an outcome of incorporating improvements based on gap analysis, requirement definition, and the articulation of what the future state of their business processes look like.

Documenting current processes, analyzing historical data, and assessing stakeholder satisfaction are important activities that need to be conducted during the needs assessment phase, but they are not the main objectives of defining the future state.

31.

A requirement is identified as being out of scope during the design phase. What is the most appropriate action?

  • Update the status to Canceled and communicate the decision to stakeholders

  • Remove the requirement from the traceability matrix

  • Defer the requirement to a later phase or project

  • Modify the requirement to fit within the current project scope

Correct answer: Update the status to Canceled and communicate the decision to stakeholders

Updating the status to Canceled and communicating the decision to stakeholders provides transparency and ensures that everyone is aware of the change. It also prevents confusion and potential rework later in the project.

Removing the requirement from the traceability matrix erases the record of its existence and can lead to confusion about why it was removed.

Deferring the requirement might be appropriate in some cases, but it's important to communicate the decision to stakeholders and ensure they understand the implications.

Modifying the requirement might be possible, but it's essential to first assess the impact of the change and discuss it with stakeholders.

32.

What is the role of metrics in the context of acceptance criteria?

  • Quantify the performance and effectiveness of a deliverable

  • Provide a subjective assessment of quality

  • Track the progress of the project timeline

  • Identify potential risk to the project 

Correct answer: Quantify the performance and effectiveness of a deliverable

Metrics are used to measure the success of a deliverable against the defined acceptance criteria. They provide objective data to evaluate whether the criteria have been met.

Metrics are designed to offer objective and quantifiable evaluations in contrast to subjective quality assessments.

For tracking the project timeline's advancement, metrics are valuable tools. Their main purpose, however, is to assess progress against the established acceptance criteria rather than solely serving as progress tracking mechanisms.

Risk management activities aim to identify potential project risks, not metrics. 

33.

As requirements are gathered, how can you best ensure that they are well-defined, clear, and testable?

  • Develop use cases and user stories

  • Use a standard requirements template

  • Create a traceability matrix

  • Organize requirements into a hierarchical structure

Correct answer: Develop use cases and user stories

Use cases and user stories provide detailed snapshots of how users will potentially interact with the business solution or service, making requirements more understandable and testable.

A template helps to categorize and organize requirements but doesn't guarantee testability.

The process of traceability is integral to planning but doesn't work to define requirements.

The use of an organizational chart or a tree is helpful to visualize requirements, but it doesn't address their clarity and testability. 

34.

A stakeholder requests a change to a requirement that has already been approved and baselined. What is your first step in handling this change?

  • Assess the impact of the change

  • Initiate a change request and follow the established change control process

  • Inform the stakeholder that the change is not possible, as the requirement is baselined

  • Clarify the requirement verbally with the stakeholder

Correct answer: Assess the impact of the change

Before initiating any formal change process, the senior BA should first evaluate the impact of the proposed change on other requirements, the project timeline, and resources to understand its feasibility and potential consequences.

Initiating a formal change request and following the established change control process is the eventual process for larger changes, but assessing the impact first helps determine if the change is truly minor and warrants a formal request.

Informing the stakeholder that the change is not possible, as the requirement is baselined is inflexible and doesn't encourage collaboration. Minor clarifications can often be accommodated.

Verbal clarification is good, but a written update ensures traceability and serves as a reference for the future.

35.

A business analyst wants to quickly gather feedback on a potential user interface design. Which tool would be most effective?

  • Prototype

  • CRUD matrix

  • Report table

  • Context diagram

Correct answer: Prototype

Prototypes are interactive models that allow users to experience and provide feedback on a design before full development.

CRUD matrices define basic data operations, not user interfaces.

Report tables present structured data, not interactive designs.  

Context diagrams show system boundaries, not user interface details.

36.

What is the main purpose of conducting a formal walkthrough of the requirements baseline with stakeholders?

  • Ensure that all stakeholders understand and agree upon the documented requirements

  • Identify and resolve any remaining defects or ambiguities in the requirements

  • Prioritize the requirements based on their business value and urgency

  • Estimate the cost and resources required to implement the requirements

Correct answer: Ensure that all stakeholders understand and agree upon the documented requirements

A walkthrough is a structured review where the project team presents and explains the requirements to stakeholders. Its primary purpose is to foster shared understanding, clarify any doubts or questions, and ensure that everyone agrees on the scope of the project as defined in the requirements baseline.

Walkthroughs can sometimes reveal minor issues, but their main goal is not defect identification.

Prioritization is typically done before the walkthrough, during the requirements analysis phase.

Cost and resource estimation occur during project planning, not the requirements walkthrough.

37.

A change request has been approved, but the implementation team encounters unforeseen technical challenges that could significantly impact the project timeline. What is your first step in addressing this situation?

  • Collaborate with the implementation team to analyze the technical challenges and explore potential solutions

  • Inform the stakeholders about the delay and potential impact on the project

  • Escalate the issue to the project manager and request their intervention

  • Create a change request to modify the original change request, addressing the technical challenges

Correct answer: Collaborate with the implementation team to analyze the technical challenges and explore potential solutions

The immediate priority is to understand the technical challenges and explore potential solutions. Collaborating with the implementation team is crucial to finding a way forward that minimizes the impact on the project.

Informing stakeholders is important but should be done after understanding the full extent of the issue and potential solutions.

Escalation to the project manager might be necessary later, but the business analyst should first try to address the issue with the implementation team.

Modifying the change request might be an option, but it's important to first understand the technical challenges and explore all possible solutions.

38.

During a requirements review session, a stakeholder suggests using a specific third-party software library for a particular functionality. Where should this information be documented?

  • Solution requirements section

  • Use case description

  • Non-functional requirements section

  • Glossary or assumptions section

Correct answer: Solution requirements section

Solution requirements capture the specific features, functionalities, or characteristics that the solution must possess to meet the business needs. The use of a third-party library directly impacts the solution design and should be documented in this section.

Use case descriptions focus on user interactions, not specific technology choices.

Non-functional requirements deal with system qualities (e.g., performance, security), not specific components.

Glossary and assumptions sections clarify terms and assumptions, not specific solution decisions.

39.

Your client is a telehealth company that is developing a new Customer Relationship Management (CRM) system. You want to understand the needs and expectations of specific user groups. Which technique would be most effective in gathering this information?

  • Personas

  • Estimation techniques

  • Planning poker

  • Expected Financial Forecasts (EFFs)

Correct answer: Personas

Personas serve as fictional representations of user groups, which can help the analyst and project team understand user’s goals, needs, and behaviors. By leveraging these insights, the business solution can be precisely tailored to align with the client's requirements, resulting in enhanced satisfaction and problem resolution.

Estimation techniques are primarily employed for predicting project duration or cost, not for collecting and understanding user requirements.

Planning poker is a collaborative technique for estimating the effort required to complete a task rather than for gaining an understanding of user requirements.

Expected Financial Forecasts (EFFs) are employed for financial projections that are independent of user needs analysis.

40.

A requirement is initially marked as High Priority but is later re-prioritized as Medium Priority. What should you do to ensure traceability of this change?

  • Update the priority in the traceability matrix and notify relevant stakeholders

  • Create a new requirement with the updated priority and link it to the original requirement

  • Delete the original requirement and replace it with the new one

  • Inform the project manager about the change but do not update the traceability matrix

Correct answer: Update the priority in the traceability matrix and notify relevant stakeholders

Updating the priority directly in the traceability matrix is the most efficient and transparent way to track the change and ensure that stakeholders are aware of the revised priority.

Creating a new requirement would create unnecessary duplication and confusion.

Deleting the original requirement would lose valuable historical information about the change.

Not updating the traceability matrix would result in inaccurate information and could lead to misunderstandings later in the project.

×